âWe do on stage the things that are supposed to happen off.â Tom Stoppardâs most famous play is exactly that; following two minor characters from Hamlet, Stoppardâs 1966 play could be described as a behind-the-scenes peek at the most dodgy Danish court in literature. But that would only scratch the metaphorical surface.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern suffer from a common post-modern literary condition; the unsettling suspicion that they are both actually fictional. With only small appearances in Shakespeareâs play, in Stoppardâs version, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern find themselves at a loose end for much of the time, left to hang around with little idea of what exactly is going on. As a great comedy writer, Stoppard manages this plot â or lack of it â with finesse. Whereas Shakespeare creates an obsequious, unlikeable pair, you canât help but feel for Stoppardâs reluctant protagonists, who worry about how to engage the âstark raving saneâ Hamlet in conversation, who are bemused by the continuous exits and entrances of the rest of the cast, and who are, in the end, simply trying to follow bewildering instructions from on high as best they can.
Itâs not a novel, but itâs still a page-turner, as you follow Ros and Guil through the mires of fictional existential crisis to their untimely end (which, considering the title, shouldnât be too much of a surprise.) In Shakespeareâs entirely different play, Hamlet agonises famously over âto be or not to beâ; in Stoppardâs quirky, undefinable masterpiece, Rosencrantz advises, âI wouldnât think about it, if I were you. Youâd only get depressed.â
Order Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead from our catalogue â